🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to restrict social media access for those under 16 is creating waves internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Movement

In Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our kids' childhood". A law may be enacted next year.
• Norway is set to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "an measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged the legislature to approve a proposal increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised parents to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is provided. Although it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a good foundation," commented the MEP behind the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a future ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised concerns. One foundation set up by the family of a girl who was lost after being exposed to harmful online content contends that a strict age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the tech sector to create tools that are appropriate and fit for minors," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, action is primarily occurring at the local government level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law limiting under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with any further time dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced measures demanding parental consent for minors to set up social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from certain individuals to mimic the Australian path, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Outside of these regions, further states are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations adopt a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in safety.

Even as this global conversation evolves, the actions of this nation and others show that policymakers around the world are less and less prepared to wait for the industry to self-regulate.