🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.